Royal commission into Bondi shooting says gun reform should be prioritised

The commission - Australia's most powerful form of public inquiry - was announced in January, three weeks after two gunmen opened fire at a Jewish event at Bondi Beach, killing 15 people.

The interim report by former High Court judge Virginia Bell gave 14 recommendations although five of them remain confidential due to national security concerns.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said a National Security Committee meeting had agreed to implement all of Bell's recommendations.

On 14 December last year, a father-and-son duo - armed with rifles and shotguns - targeted a Sunday afternoon event at a Bondi Beach park.

Sajid Akram, 50, was killed by police at the scene of the shootings and his son Naveed Akram - the other alleged attacker - was critically injured and later transferred from hospital to prison.

The 24-year-old has been charged with 59 offences, including 15 counts of murder and one of committing a terrorist attack.

Thursday's report recommended that state and federal governments should prioritise efforts to finalise and implement "nationally consistent" firearms reforms as well as a proposed gun buyback scheme.

Gun reforms put forward in the wake of the shooting have received a lukewarm response from some of Australia's states and territories, with Queensland, for example, refusing the buyback scheme and cap on firearms ownership.

It also said New South Wales (NSW) police procedures used for Jewish high holy days should be extended to other "high risk Jewish festivals and events, especially those with a public facing element".

Other recommendations included a review of joint counter-terrorism teams in Australia - made up of federal and state police forces, and the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) - as well as making the counter-terrorism commissioner's role full time.

The prime minister and national cabinet ministers should also take part in counter-terrorism exercises within nine months of each federal election, the report said.

The report said that it had not identified any gap in existing legal frameworks that would have prevented the attack, or impeded the ability of law enforcement or other agencies to respond to it.

"In these respects, no issue requiring urgent or immediate action has been identified," the report said.

It added that any failures to identify and act upon intelligence in the lead up to the shooting and in the allocation of police to the Hanukkah festival would be addressed in hearings, though some of these may be closed to the public.

Albanese said the report showed "no urgent changes" were required but that governments "could always do better".

David Ossip, President of the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies, said the report was "an important first step" in examining the circumstances around the attack but that it was "only part of the picture".

Antisemitism was "not only a law enforcement issue" but a "societal issue" and "the environment for Jewish Australians had been deteriorating well before Bondi", he said.

A first series of public hearings for the inquiry, which is looking at the rise of antisemitism in society and institutions and the events leading up to the mass shooting, is to begin on Monday.

A final report is to be delivered on the anniversary of the shooting.

In the days and weeks after the attack - Australia's worst mass shooting in almost 30 years - Albanese resisted calls to launch a royal commission, saying it would create disunity in the community.

Instead, he said a review into intelligence and law enforcement agencies by the country's former spy chief Dennis Richardson was the best way to respond to the shooting. That review was to look at what authorities had done in the lead-up to the attack and what improvements could be made.

But after weeks of mounting pressure from some of the families of the victims as well as politicians, high-profile public figures and the wider community, Albanese reversed his decision. A NSW state royal commission and the earlier review was folded into the federal inquiry.

A raft of legal reforms were also introduced including tighter laws on gun ownership and regulation, along with stricter hate speech legislation.

The public hearings on Monday will focus on defining antisemitism, how it manifests in society as well as the lived experiences of Jewish Australians in all facets of the community.

Bell has previously warned that the scope of the evidence that the inquiry can look at will be limited given the current court proceedings for Naveed Akram.

The aircraft burst into flames after it crashed at Parafield Airport in Adelaide.

The mother-of-two shaved her six-year-old's son's head and eyebrows as part of the deception.

What happened when Rebel Wilson gave evidence in court?The Hollywood star is accused by fellow Australian actress Charlotte MacInnes of making defamatory statements.

A judge found Royce Mallett's killer, who was displaying symptoms of psychosis at the time of the attack, could not be found criminally responsible.