Are US and Israel aligned on Iran war? Deciphering Trump's post after gas field attacks

Israel hit Iran's South Pars - part of the world's largest natural gas field – and Tehran retaliated by striking an energy complex in Qatar. The attacks led to a spike in energy prices, and fuelled Trump's wrath.

On his Truth Social media platform, Trump threatened Iran again and said he didn't know about Israel's plans for the attack.

So what does the language used by the US president tell us about the course of the war and the extent to which the US and Israel are aligned on its strategy and goals?

The president says the US "knew nothing about this particular attack".

This flies in the face of multiple newspaper reports in Israel in the aftermath of the attack.

The attack "was co-ordinated in advance with the United States and… agreed upon between Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu and US President Trump," the centrist paper Yedioth Ahronoth reported.

Right-wing paper Israel Hayom goes further, saying "President Trump discussed the upcoming Israeli strike in [Iran's coastal city of] Asaluyeh with leaders of three Persian Gulf states over the weekend".

As is often the case with the president's assertions, it is not easy to know where the truth lies.

His choice of words to describe the Israeli attack is also telling. "Out of anger," he says, Israel "violently lashed out" against the gas field. This is the sort of language used to describe some of Iran's wilder retaliations - not a carefully considered military operation by a close ally.

Is Trump suggesting that Israel acted unwisely?

The president's use of capitals is notorious, but in this lengthy post, he resorts to all caps just once.

"NO MORE ATTACKS WILL BE MADE BY ISRAEL pertaining to this extremely important and valuable South Pars Field," he writes, "unless Iran unwisely decides to attack a very innocent, in this case Qatar."

For a president who needs to feel he's in control, was this a reflection of an undertaking already given, or a shot across Benjamin Netanyahu's bows?

As is often the case with Trump's stream-of-consciousness Truth Social posts, it's not easy to tell.

But it carries echoes of reports that Mr Trump was angered by Israel's attacks on Iranian oil depots earlier in the war.

So are Israel and American war aims diverging?

It would probably be a mistake to read too much into a single late-night post from President Trump.

Israeli officials are keen to emphasise that the two countries are in lockstep, even if they occasionally, inadvertently, hint at gaps.

"We want the same thing."

But while the two allies clearly agree on much, Israel has been much more consistent about its desire to see regime change in Iran.

Officials quoted in the Israeli media this morning have painted the South Pars attack as part of an ongoing effort to undermine the regime's authority.

"The gas supply to citizens is being shut off, and that will bring the uprising closer," one official told Yedioth Ahronoth's Yossi Yehoshua.

Prime Minister Netanyahu has made no secret of his decades-long desire to topple the Islamic regime, which he – and many Israelis – see as intent on destroying the Jewish state.

While the US has concentrated much of its military effort on degrading Iran's missile and drone capability, sinking its Navy and, in recent days, attacking targets along Iran's long Gulf shoreline, Israel has gone to great lengths to assassinate Iran's leaders and attack elements of state control, including paramilitary Basij units responsible for much of the violent crackdown on protests earlier this year.

David Satterfield, a former US special envoy for the Middle East, said Israeli and American objectives are closely aligned - except when it comes to when to call a halt.

For Netanyahu, Satterfield said, Iran's chaotic breakdown is "a desirable goal."

In his post, President Trump insists that Qatar was neither involved nor had any advance knowledge of the attacks.

But "unfortunately", he writes, "Iran did not know this" before retaliating "unjustifiably and unfairly".

Trump is certainly not letting Iran off the hook here, but he does appear to suggest that Iran did not know the full picture when it struck back - that Tehran may, erroneously, have thought Qatar was involved.

Parts of the Truth Social post are classic Trump - threats to use unprecedented levels of violence to get his way.

If Iran attacks Qatar's LNG [liquefied natural gas] facilities again, he warns, the US "with or without the help or consent of Israel, will massively blow up the entirety of the South Pars Gas Field at an amount of strength and power that Iran has never seen or witnessed before".

Trump and his combative Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth are fond of such bombast. Donald Trump, the self-styled "president of peace", frequently deploys this kind of rhetoric.

And it is certainly true that Washington could inflict infinitely more damage on Iran – and its people – than it has already.

The reference to Israeli consent for threatened action is jarring.

Was this a rebuke to Benjamin Netanyahu – and a reminder, in no uncertain terms, of the need to consult more closely in the future?

With elements of Donald Trump's Maga movement [Make America Great Again] already convinced that it is Israel, not America, calling the shots in this war, there is a risk that some of the president's critics might see this as an unfortunate Freudian slip.

But with oil and gas prices rising again, thanks in part to the latest tit-for-tat attacks between Israel and Iran, and little obvious sign of progress in efforts to secure shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, Donald Trump sounds impatient.

This war continues to throw him curve balls, which the administration does not appear to have anticipated.

Support for the war, still sky high in Israel, is at less than 50% in the US. The conflict could help secure another term as prime minister for Benjamin Netanyahu, while costing Donald Trump's Republican Party in November's midterm elections.

Israel and the US are close military allies, but this is the first time they've fought a war together.

Between them, they've racked up some impressive achievements in just under three weeks.

But with each passing day, the war is proving more complicated than Donald Trump thought.

Analysts fear the disruption to supply could continue for longer than initially thought.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent broached waiving sanctions on oil already at sea, which would be a stunning reversal of longstanding American policy.

RAF Fairford is being used by the United States Air Force to launch operations against Iran.

The former counter-terrorism head resigned on Tuesday over the war with Iran, saying the country posed "no imminent threat" to the US.